TABUK CITY, Kalinga – Mining has always been a deeply sensitive issue for the iKalingas and the broader community of iKalingas. For decades, the operations of Batong Buhay Gold Mines Inc. (BBGMI) from the 1970s to the early 1990s caused widespread environmental and socio-economic problems in the province and in the then-Municipality of Tabuk.
These issues included siltation and pollution of rivers, which resulted in damage to farmlands, crops, and livestock. The rivers traversing the area suffered from dead fish floating along riverbanks, and water quality declined to levels unsafe for consumption, posing health risks to residents. The environmental degradation not only affected the natural ecosystem but also the livelihoods of local farmers and fisherfolk, who bore the brunt of the mining’s adverse effects.
Following the closure of BBGMI, the community experienced a much-needed respite. The waters of the Chico River cleared, aquatic life returned, and farmlands and livestock were spared from further harm. The community’s hope for a healthier environment and sustainable livelihood was renewed.
However, in 2024, concerns resurfaced when news broke of a potential new mining project in Pasil. Rumors of another mining company interested in operating within the area stirred fears among residents who had endured the negative impacts of past mining activities.
In the later part of 2024, Makilala Mining Company conducted site inspections and testing. By the start of this year, official reports confirmed that Makilala Mining would indeed operate a mine in Pasil. While the community was surprised, representatives of the company assured stakeholders that their technology would differ significantly from BBGMI’s. They claimed that advanced mining techniques would prevent spillage and the seepage of tailings into the Chico River and other water bodies, minimizing environmental risks.
Despite these assurances, concerns grew, especially considering the lack of comprehensive information campaigns or information, education, communication (IEC) initiatives directed at the local communities, particularly in Tabuk City.
Recently, circulating reports claimed that Tabuk City had given its consent to the mining operations. However, city officials expressed surprise at these reports, noting that no official resolution or formal approval had been issued by the City Council. According to the Office of the Sangguniang Panlungsod (SP) Secretary, no such resolution exists on record. The City Council has yet to hold a formal discussion or approve any resolution regarding the mining project, and the city’s local chief executive retains the authority to approve or veto such decisions.
In an interview, Mayor Darwin Estrañero clarified that he was not aware of any resolution granting consent to Makilala Mining’s operations. He emphasized that there has been no official approval from the city government, and reiterated that any development project must undergo thorough review and consultation.
Further review of SP records confirmed the absence of any resolution or formal endorsement. Additionally, there have been no IEC campaigns conducted with local farmer organizations or irrigators’ associations to inform them about the project and its potential impacts.
While the city government recognizes the importance of development that creates employment and livelihood opportunities, it also prioritizes environmental protection and the welfare of its residents.
In light of these developments, the city government officially issued a statement denying any grant of consent to Makilala Mining’s operations. As a stakeholder that could be affected, the city affirms that any decision to pursue mining activities must be thoroughly studied and approved by the Sangguniang Panlungsod. It is the city’s duty to ensure that environmental integrity, public health, and residents’ welfare are safeguarded before any project proceeds. By CPIO
